The RAW vs JPEG debate

Started 6 months ago | Discussion thread
seilerbird666
Senior MemberPosts: 1,027
Like?
Re: The RAW vs JPEG debate
In reply to Alfred Molon, 6 months ago

Alfred Molon wrote:

But look what can happen to a RAW shooter:

https://picasaweb.google.com/SeilerBird/2005#5612874643375028594

Too much contrast and saturation.

With RAW processing there is a tendency to overdo it if you are not very careful.

It is too bad you really don't have a clue as to what you are talking about. The image you referenced was taken in 2005 by a Kodak DX6490 point and shoot camera that is NOT EVEN CAPABLE OF PRODUCING A RAW IMAGE. It is a 4 megapixel camera and that is a jpg straight out of camera. It really needs some post processing because the colors are too bright. Now you have proven my point. Jpgs straight out of the camera need post processing. The shot was taken two years before I started shooting RAW.

--
My photos:
picasaweb.google.com/seilerbird

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow