Weight: system more important than sensor size?

Started 6 months ago | Discussions thread
bobn2
Forum ProPosts: 20,151
Like?
Re: Weight: system more important than sensor size?
In reply to John King, 6 months ago

John King wrote:

zxaar wrote:

Moti wrote:

zxaar wrote:


Moti wrote:

zxaar wrote:

Problem is that you can not create shallow DOF on smaller sensor while larger sensor could create deeper DOF when it needs.

If he is not obsessed with bokeh then this hardly matters to him. I am also sure that those who buy FF also know how to use their lenses. We are not dumb As

Thst has nothing to do with him. To remind you, you are the one who pointed out the problem shallow DOF and I just answered you on face value with suggestions of ways around it. And btw, you'll be surprised how many who buy FF don't know how to use them properly. That has nothing to do with being dumb. It is just a lack of basic photography knoledge.


O the fact still stays that bigger sensor has better DOF control. This is not up for debate.

You are the one who pointed that some people may not want shallow DOF, that is personal and very subjective. So for such people they will be far better with pentax Q because it is better than m43 on size and weight , if this is such people's reason to chose m43 over FF.

so again , we are back to.

Problem is that you can not create shallow DOF on smaller sensor while larger sensor could create deeper DOF when it needs.

--
::> Knowledge is mother of efficiency.

I can achieve whatever DoF I choose to with my 4/3rds bodies and lenses.

Only because you do not choose to achieve the DOF you could get with f/4 or below on FF.

--
Bob

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow