70-200 f4 or 70-200 f2.8

Started Nov 15, 2012 | Discussions thread
greenmanphoto
Contributing MemberPosts: 584Gear list
Like?
Re: 70-200 f4 or 70-200 f2.8
In reply to westcoasthd, Nov 17, 2012

There's another reason to consider the new f4 over the older f2.8: lens warranty of a new lens versus a used lens. Unless you can find a new VRI f2.8 so you have the warranty, then that's a consideration, IMHO. YMMV.

Sam

westcoasthd wrote:

The only reason to buy the new f4 lens over the older VRI is size. Optically from early reports the f4 lens should be very sharp, but you have less flexibility with TCs. They will cost the same almost the same with a foot, so the f4 version would have yield the same quality with out stopping down and that is very difficult to do.

-- hide signature --

Sam B.
D200, 16-85mm, 35-135mm, Sigma 10-20 f3.5 N8008s, Gitzo 2531, Induro DM-01 ballhead
Certified Texas Master Naturalist
Proud WSSA Member #260!
www.flickr.com/photos/sibeardjr
www.doormouse-editions.com

 greenmanphoto's gear list:greenmanphoto's gear list
Nikon D200 Nikon D300 Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR Tamron SP 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di VC USD Sigma 10-20mm F3.5 EX DC HSM +5 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow