Weight: system more important than sensor size?

Started 6 months ago | Discussion thread
Great Bustard
Forum ProPosts: 15,780
Like?
Re: Weight: system more important than sensor size?
In reply to bobn2, 6 months ago

bobn2 wrote:

Great Bustard wrote:

bobn2 wrote:

Great Bustard wrote:

bobn2 wrote:

azazel1024 wrote:

If you just want the exact same exposure

Why would you ever want the exact same exposure?

When the exact same exposure on the different formats represents the "best" shot for each. For example, if the best shot was 50mm f/2 1/200 ISO 400 on mFT, 100mm f/2 1/200 ISO 400 on FF would be the best shot for FF is the lesser DOF and/or lesser noise was more desirable than the deeper DOF of the mFT shot.

However, if not, then the best shot for FF would be 100mm f/4 1/200 ISO 1600, which would be the equivalent to the mFT photo, although some intermediate balance, like 100mm f/2.8 1/200 ISO 800 might be better still.

As you and I say, the competent photographer must balance exposure with DOF, motion blur, and blown highlights. In the situations where the same exposure represents the best balance of the other elements, then the same exposure on different systems represents the best shot, even if the pics look different.

What you are saying is not that you want the exact same exposure, but that is is possible that the optimum balance of blur, DOF and highlights might end up at the same exposure by chance.

Not merely by chance, but...

I can't see that would be very often, certainly not often enough to make aiming for the same exposure the sensible thing to do.

...very common in in low light situations, as often minimizing motion blur and having a less noisy photo is more important than a deeper DOF and/or sharp corners.

Yes, but that still is by chance. The intention is not to have the exact same exposure, it is to minimise motion blur and have a less noisy photo. For instance, if you had a 5DIII fitted with a 85/1.2 and an E-M5 fitted with a 45/1.8, if you needed to minimise noise and blur, you'd go right to f/1.2 on the Canon, and not stop at f/1.8, simply because that was what you had on the Olympus. I can't see any situation where the aim of your photography would be to set a particular exposure, you're always choosing your exposure with some other goal in mind.

Yes, absolutely.  I can't imagine any situation where a competent photographer would aim for a particular exposure.  The competent photographer always chooses the best balance, in terms of their artistic vision for the final photo, of several factors, such as DOF, blur, and noise.

Of course, given that many leave those choices up to the camera (Auto and P mode), it's understandable how they compare formats at the same f-ratio (f/2 = f/2 = f/2) and then complain that the DOF of larger formats is "too shallow" since a FF camera in Auto or P mode would likely choose the same (or very close) settings as any other camera in the same mode, assuming that they meter the scene in the same manner.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow