Weight: system more important than sensor size?

Started 7 months ago | Discussions thread
illy
Forum ProPosts: 11,114
Like?
Re: Depends on segment
In reply to rrr_hhh, 7 months ago

rrr_hhh wrote:

MadsR wrote:

I think you are looking at different market segments here.

Both Canon and Nikon have a very American view of their camera ranges, the bigger the better. Even though you can make FF cameras and lenses a lot smaller than they are today, the producers at least seem to think that the market want big heavy gear. Perhaps to show off? (You can see the 1Dx is better than the 650D simply because it is twice the size... Sort of like American cars)

Olympus and Sony on the other hand are very Japaneese in their designs, going smaller is better, to the same extremes sometimes, designing cameras that are not good to hold because they have become too small, at least for western hands.

I think that Canon and Nikon have just been lazy ! Meanwhile Sony and Olympus realizing that they couldn't compete with them have looked for market shares that weren't already taken. I'm not sure that this has something to do with the first being more American geared and the others more Japanese. Although I agree that for Americans bigger is better, the American market isn't the only one and IMO decisions aren't made only for the American market. Others factors comes in.

--
rrr_hhh

something like the D800 doesn't come from a company i'd call lazy, their application of current technology is different, Olympus and Panasonic have all their eggs in one basket, Canon and Nikon on the other hand have 3 different formats with a very high level of compatibility

--
The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow