|
Re: 70-200 vrii vs prime lenses quality
In reply to MJSfoto1956,
6 months ago
|
MJSfoto1956 wrote:
to be fair, the 70-200 is weakest at 200mm, strongest at 70mm. This is typical of Canikon zoom lenses btw. So if you are going to compare this zoom to a prime, you would have to consider which focal length. I'm sure for your purposes the Micro Nikkor 200m would deliver substantially better IQ than the 70-200mm @ 200mm. But at 70mm, the 70-200mm might "hold its own" compared to the Micro Nikkor 60mm. The Micro Nikkor 105mm is Nikon's sharpest lens period. So no fair comparison there.
Absolutely, I agree with you, I just don't think there are tons of real-world IQ differences the OP will encounter when doing casual Portraits and Kids.
I also meant to mention for the OP to consider the just-announced 70-200 f/4 as well.
--
Best Regards,
SteveK
'A camera is an instrument that teaches people how to see without a camera.' -- Dorothea Lange
http://images.nikonians.org/galleries/showgallery.php/cat/500/ppuser/119002
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 |