|
Re: ephotozine reviews 35/1.8 and 16-50
In reply to cb00,
6 months ago
|
cb00 wrote:
pmow wrote:
captura wrote:
A quick & dirty review of the 16-50. The only kind of distortion they tested for was Chromatic distortion but the problems lie elsewhere.
For a lot of money, the 35-1.8. For that price it better be good.
Is $350 a lot of money for a 35/1.8? The SAL is $200, but this one is smaller and let's me shoot with stabilization. Even the "cheaper" manual glass isn't that cheap, and obviously does away with OSS and AF.
It's $450
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-SEL35F18-35mm-Prime-Fixed/dp/B0096W1P5W
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
