|
Re: The impressive 18-55 2,8-4,0
In reply to shigzeo ?,
6 months ago
|
shigzeo ? wrote:
JCP_76 wrote:
MuMinded wrote:
I agree that not having the aperture markings is a let down.How is such a thing possible on a variable speed zoom lens? The markings would only be correct when the lens was set to 18mm.
It is very very old technology. Zooms basically started out like that, with apertures that effectively closed down as the zoom went out.
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/companies/nikon/nikkoresources/zoomsMF/35105mm.htm
--
http://www.flickr.com/photos/shigzeo/
Advice/criticism/appreciation appreciated!
With variable aperture zooms you get a more compact package. The lens as an 18-55mm f/2.8 would be much larger and bulkier. Having differing apertures is no trouble in a modern camera with automatic exposure. So in this case I am all for 18-55mm f/2.8-4.
Eric
--
I never saw an ugly thing in my life: for let the form of an object
be what it may - light, shade, and perspective will always make it
beautiful. - John Constable (quote)
See my Blog at: http://www.erphotoreview.com/ (bi-weekly)
Flickr Photostream: http://www.flickr.com/photos/28177041@N03/ (updated daily)
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | 8 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago |