maybe we should worry more about "charm" than other aspects such as rez and mp......

Started 6 months ago | Discussion thread
Ian Stuart Forsyth
Contributing MemberPosts: 782
Like?
Re: Maybe you should worry about...
In reply to Joseph S Wisniewski, 6 months ago

Joseph S Wisniewski wrote:

Maybe you should worry about the obsession with this issue that has driven you to post essentially the same thread over a dozen times. It always goes the same way.

  • You make some statement about how much more passion film photographs show, or how sterile digital is, or how film inspires you more, or how film images have more depth.
  • You post some passionless, sterile, uninspired film shots to prove that film is more awesomer than digital.
  • People call BS on your post and point out that your images were developed in suckanol.
There is a saying, typically incorrectly attributed to Einstein:
If you're trying to "convert" people, you're doing such an embarrassing job of it that you're just convincing folks that film fans are a bunch of flipping loons. This is dpReview, we don't run on triodes here.
  • Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.

--
Rahon Klavanian 1912-2008. Armenian genocide survivor, amazing cook, scrabble master, and loving grandmother. You will be missed. Ciao! Joseph www.swissarmyfork.com

Looking for Lucky Charms

But only found coo-coo for  Cocoa Puffs

--
The Camera is only a tool, photography is deciding how to use it.
The most important piece of equipment in photography is the lens cap, if used incorrectly all your photo will be under exposed.
The hardest part about capturing wildlife is not the photographing portion; it’s getting them to sign a model release

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow