How big would a 100-200 f2.8 m43 OIS be?

I didn't look at the RAW files yet, I was just basing my assessment on what was posted here. Could be just the infamous DPreview image-rendering system clouding things!

D@mn that Olympus! I was all set to get the 75mm f/1.8 instead of the Panny 35-100 f/2.8. That 40-150mm f/2.8 rumor shakes things up. Though it is difficult to imagine that the lens would come in at under 650 grams or so (compared to the 305g of the 75mm) and the cost is likely to be at least that of the 35-100.

--
"If you simplify your English, you are freed from the worst follies of orthodoxy. You cannot speak any of the necessary dialects, and when you make a stupid remark its stupidity will be obvious, even to yourself." - George Orwell "Politics and the English Language"
"Unfortunately, in digital photography a lot of people are seeing pixels, not photographs ... Everyone together now: it's not the pixels. Sing it with me." - Thom Hogan
"If you pick up a camera with any sort of serious intent, you will at least occasionally need to use a flash. Done deal. Lock solid, Take it to the bank." - Joe McNally