
|
Agree
In reply to jpr2,
7 months ago
|
jpr2 wrote:
...somehow the shots from the I-st (the 1/1000 sec. one) seem not to be exactly tack sharp; the second series is much better in this respect - but then the runner is simply closer in the II-nd series; hence my question: does 16-50PZ display any problems in focusing at further away targets (I mean stationary ones)? There are some lenses yielding pretty good results close by, and failing on more distant targets;
jpr2
I agree, and I noticed this as well. I confess that I don't have a ready explanation, but I really haven't tested the lens for sharpness (etc.) at 50mm in general. My only other explanation is that I literally did this test under duress in under 2 minutes, since it was so cold it was hard to motivate my son to participate -- we both wanted to get back indoors asap.
--
cheers,
JSE
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 months ago | 7 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago |