Proper Blind Exposure with a Gray Card

Started 6 months ago | Discussion thread
nikkorwatcher
Contributing MemberPosts: 684
Like?
Re: Pointless obsession
In reply to steephill, 6 months ago

steephill wrote:

This 12% vs 18% is a very old argument indeed, ever since Ansel Adams was a lad in fact. And it is utterly redundant now that we have direct access to histograms in camera as well as a whole host of colour management tools from camera to print. There is no longer any need to worship at the feet of your chosen guru, just pick up the tools and do it for yourself.

The thread has got a little messy and so please let me check what seems to be the thread of estimating exposure without reference to the histogram:

The theoretical argument really depends on the fact that digital responds more linearly than film and exposure generally needs to be adjusted downwards compared to film to avoid blowing highlights in a typical daylight scene.

Metering responds differently taking a reading of one colour channel only. Depending on the scene and the ambient light balance I assume. Since lighting more or less goes from red to blue then metering from red on an outdoor scheme will overexpose more than in incandescent lighting, no?

If the in-camera metering is an estimation of what seems to be going on in the scene then I think some manufacturers are doing very well in their estimates. But estimates are all they can be, just guessing a lot of photographs have strong daylight highlights and a green or gray foreground or face similar to 18% (or 12%) saturation. When you look on it as that simple then perhaps it isn't surprising that manufacturers generally get within half a stop of the ideal.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow