|
Canon 135 + 1.4 TC vs 200 f/2.8 for pro football stadium
6 months ago
|
So I just got back from the Vikings/Lions game. Because of the restrictive lens policy, I couldn't take a longer lens. Brought my 135 and used a 1.4 TC. I don't use the 135 much anymore since purchasing the 70-200 2.8 is II. Would it make sense to sell the 135 and buy a 200 f/2.8 for use in stadiums w/ restrictive lens policies?
Incidentally this sequence of photos is from a play in which Adrian Peterson broke loose for a long TD. The camera body was a 5DM3
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago |