Best backup camera for sports/general/travel usage? D600? D5200? Something else?

Started Nov 11, 2012 | Discussions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Contributing MemberPosts: 646
Best backup camera for sports/general/travel usage? D600? D5200? Something else?
Nov 11, 2012

I'd be interested in opinions about a second body. I currently shoot a D3s for sports/action/receptions. I don't make a living doing this, but I do shoot regularly for outside organizations. My backup camera is my now quite old D300. Since getting my D3s two years ago, I rarely use my D300: it's outclassed easily by my D3s, so I'm reluctant to use the D300 unless I have no choice. I'd like to trade in or sell my d300, but I don't know what I should replace it with.

-The D800 is too much for what I need resolution wise, and not quite fast enough for sports photography. However, it feels good in hand, albeit it's not small nor light.

-The D600 is not as comfortable in hand for me (grip seems a bit shallow), but is more affordable, shoots a bit faster, and is more reasonable in terms of image size. As an FX camera, I can use all my existing, "big" lens. All my lens are the AFS lens.

-Why would I even consider the D5200? I like the articulating screen, the small, fits-in-my-hand size, and I would still get some value out of my DX lens, while still being able to use my FX lens if necessary. Since it is spec'd at 5 fps, and has a sensor that seems very good for low light, I like it as a prospect for traveling.

I also have a Panasonic GH2 and GF1 that I use primarily when traveling, but I've been waiting until they released f2.8 zoom lenses, which Panasonic did recently. I figured this line of cameras would make for a good travel alternative. Except their 35-100 (70-200 equivalent) is over $1500 Cdn - not cheap! The GH3 is also bigger so I'm not sure the GH series represents a viable upgrade path anymore. For also the price and size, I could just get a D5200, mount my 18-200 lens, and I figure it would be almost the same size.

I'm torn between having a modestly lighter FX camera (D600) that can shoot exactly what I want but at the expense of cost and also a much heavier weight. (I would probably get the 28-300 as an all around lens) VS a lighter, more versatile DX camera (D5200) that doesn't do quite as good of a job for sports, but would be cheaper overall, easier for me to hold, and more manageable to travel with.

Any thoughts?

ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Flat view
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
ForumParentFirstPreviousNextNext unread
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow