Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Laurie Wilson	6 months ago	14
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Hans von der Crone	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Laurie Wilson	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning	technic	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	novak977	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Hans von der Crone	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	technic	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Rehabdoc	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	technic	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Jorginho	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Philip Corlis	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	creeker	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	TiagoReil	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Laurie Wilson	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	TiagoReil	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Enir4	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	santiclaws	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	TiagoReil	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	santiclaws	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	malch	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Laurie Wilson	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	blue_skies	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	twald	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	TiagoReil	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	technic	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Enir4	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	romicva	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Enir4	6 months ago
re: SEL 16-50 & N6...	jpr2	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Adamant	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	romicva	6 months ago
Enrique & Laurie: after the 16-50 fiasco...	jpr2	6 months ago
Re: Enrique & Laurie: after the 16-50 fiasco...	Enir4	6 months ago
Re: Enrique & Laurie: after the 16-50 fiasco...	Cheepnis	6 months ago
Re: Enrique & Laurie: after the 16-50 fiasco...	ericdfw	6 months ago
Re: Enrique & Laurie: after the 16-50 fiasco...	Rehabdoc	6 months ago
re: TWO disqualifying problems with the rx100	jpr2	6 months ago
Re: Enrique & Laurie: after the 16-50 fiasco...	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Rehabdoc	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	willym	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Erik Magnuson	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Rehabdoc	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Erik Magnuson	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	blue_skies	6 months ago	2
Laurie, thanks for your post. The images look good for a kit lens, but nothing you could not	Jerry R	6 months ago
nothing you could not get with the Zeiss 24mm??	technic	6 months ago	1
Technic, a few step forward, a few steps back, & a little cropping.	Jerry R	6 months ago
Re: nothing you could not get with the Zeiss 24mm??	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Laurie, thanks for your post. The images look good for a kit lens, but nothing you could not	linkon	6 months ago
Re: Laurie, thanks for your post. The images look good for a kit lens, but nothing you could not	DA photo	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	FuzzyQball	6 months ago	3
Precicely the point I have been making (nt)	gkstar	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Sergey Borachev	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	gkstar	6 months ago
Survey, the laws of physics also apply to M43. Since th M43 sensor is smaller the lenses	Jerry R	6 months ago
Re: Survey, the laws of physics also apply to M43. Since th M43 sensor is smaller the lenses	captura	6 months ago
Sergey, I am exactly with you.	PeterNMIF	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	Sergey Borachev	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	blue_skies	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	Sergey Borachev	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	malch	6 months ago
re: market as a discerning jury of optical IQ ??	jpr2	6 months ago	1
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	technic	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	Rehabdoc	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	franzel	6 months ago
all about the lenses	technic	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	GodSpeaks	6 months ago
worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	RussellInCincinnati	6 months ago	5
Re: worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	viking79	6 months ago	2
Re: worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	TiagoReil	6 months ago	3
Re: worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	viking79	6 months ago	2
Re: worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	Laurie Wilson	6 months ago
Re: worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	Kashmir442	6 months ago	3
name-calling will get you everywhere	RussellInCincinnati	6 months ago	3
selective quoting and misrepresenting even goes a longer way	robert1955	6 months ago
Well...	cxsparc	6 months ago
Re: Well...	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	robert1955	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Jonathan_Whiteman	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	technic	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	DimitriDV	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Hans von der Crone	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Rehabdoc	6 months ago
How about some real-world context!	Carlgo	6 months ago	1
Re: How about some real-world context!	Hans von der Crone	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	DimitriDV	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	forpetessake	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	burkm	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Beaverhelmet	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Enir4	6 months ago
Duh!	forpetessake	6 months ago	3
Re: Duh!	blue_skies	6 months ago	1
Re: Duh!	Enir4	6 months ago
Re: Duh!	forpetessake	6 months ago
Re: Duh!	Enir4	6 months ago	2
Duh! Again!	forpetessake	6 months ago	3
Re: Duh!	winono	6 months ago	2
Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	jpr2	6 months ago	1
Re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	quezra	6 months ago
Re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	GaryW	6 months ago
re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	jpr2	6 months ago	1
Re: re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	quezra	6 months ago	1
Re: re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	Enir4	6 months ago	3
Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	jpr2	6 months ago	3
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	linkon	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	Enir4	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	upsidedown	6 months ago
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	Enir4	6 months ago	2
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	franzel	6 months ago	1
New oranges ...	forpetessake	6 months ago	1
Re: New oranges ...	Enir4	6 months ago
Re: New oranges ...	blue_skies	6 months ago	2
Re: New oranges ...	franzel	6 months ago	2
Re: New oranges ...	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	franzel	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	verybiglebowski	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	Enir4	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	malch	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	willym	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	Rehabdoc	6 months ago
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	verybiglebowski	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	Erik Magnuson	6 months ago
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	malch	6 months ago
re: excellent photography is possible even with a bottom of a Coke bottle...	jpr2	6 months ago
Re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	quezra	6 months ago
Re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	winono	6 months ago	1
Laurie is a guy!	clail	6 months ago	1
Re: Duh!	quezra	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Laurie Wilson	6 months ago
Laurie: figers [tight] crossed that it won't be the same story again with...	jpr2	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	captura	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Enir4	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	technic	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Russell Evans	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	firefox23508	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	blue_skies	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	firefox23508	6 months ago	1

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

FLICKR	150
Would you move to a full frame DSLR?	150
* this week through your m43 - 2013.05.20 *	84
Why is the 55-210 so big?	75
Do you change lenses in the fields?	71
Sony A mount cameras could go mirrorless in 2014	67
OMD Shutter shock revisited...and a possible ...	63
To owners of M4/3 and D-SLRs: which came first?	57
Pentax FF rumor gaining steam	51
stolen D800 in Paris.	45
My Friend + his daughter for retouch	44
Why does my photo lack detail...?	44
Macro lens for micro four thirds, any good choice?	42
Has digital stitching made high megapixel ...	42
Struggling with new AF-S 80-400mm	40
It's time to stop whining about Adobe. . .	36
I sold my Canon...	34
*Monday Macro/Closeup 20 May 2013*	29
Is the 24-70mm 2.8 a good all-around travel lens?	27
NYC Nightscapes	27