Canon 70-200 F4 IS vs 70-200 2.8II IS

Started Nov 9, 2012 | Questions thread
Shop cameras & lenses ▾
Veteran MemberPosts: 3,915Gear list
Its a draw...
In reply to kevindar, Nov 10, 2012
f4IS vs 2.8 IS II, simply comes down to size, price, weight, vs one stop of light and use of 2x tc. Beyond that, as for image quality, Nothing between them. just simple s that. Minute sample to sample variations, dof, subject/camera movement, slight misfocus will have far more to do with your 200% pixel peeping analysis than anything else.

Agree 100%. Its a complete draw in terms of picture IQ. Have used both a lot. Have the mrk. II f/2.8 IS L now, because I really need that extra stop. Otherwise I would using the f/4.0 IS L. Was not happy with the original f/2.8 IS L - the mrk. II is visibly sharper - especially @ 200mm where most people tend to shoot most their shots.

 maiaibing's gear list:maiaibing's gear list
Canon EOS 6D Canon EOS 5DS R Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM +8 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow