1
|
Re: Criteria to keep Sony 75-300 over Minolta 70-210 F4 Beercan
In reply to MartBob,
6 months ago
|
MartBob wrote:
I had the chance to find the Sony 75-300 and the Minolta 70-210 F4 at very good price and now Im asking myself witch one should I resale.
I like the Sony because it's a bit smaller because of it's external zoom and the 300mm range is a good plus value.
In the other hand I like the F4 of the minolta all the way to 210mm but since this lens is more for outdoor picture I don't know if I really need it. It's also very big and don't quite fit in my bag
Picture quality are ok in both case nothing extraordinary, even with the beercan. I think that the legend is a little overrated. Im I right ?
What would you recommend ?
Thanks
Why not keep both? The resale value is pretty low anyway. I have both lenses, and usually I grab the beercan. It is not that much larger than the 75-300. And I certainly wouldn't call the beercan an outdoor lens, in particular not when compared to the 75-300. If you need to shoot indoors, the beercan will be much better.
If you don't appreciate the quality of the beercan when comparing it with the 75-300, you just may have a bad sample. For me, it is quite obvious with lens is better.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
