images: A900 vs A99 RAW high ISO comparison

Started Nov 9, 2012 | Discussions thread
mick232
Contributing MemberPosts: 757Gear list
Like?
Re: images: A900 vs A99 RAW high ISO comparison
In reply to barri, Nov 10, 2012

barri wrote:

I had my A99 now for 3 days, and I must say that I like it a lot. Mostly for its EVF, faster AF, lighter weight, and video capability, when compared to my A900. Especially the EVF I prefer so much more over an OVF. It's great to be able to tweak your exposure before you actually take the picture.

But also in terms of IQ the A99 is a step up. This is most apparent at high ISO. See below two comparisons of 100% crops. Shot at ISO 6400 and with the same lens.

Everyone should know by now that the A99 is better at high ISO than the A900.

How about sharpness and CA comparisons at base ISO for a change? These are rarely done in forums and also in reviews, but comparing that would be exploring new territory instead of re-iterating what is already widely known.

 mick232's gear list:mick232's gear list
Sony Alpha NEX-5 Sony SLT-A99 Tamron SP AF 70-200mm F/2.8 Di LD (IF) MACRO Sony 75-300mm F4.5-5.6 Sony 135mm F1.8 ZA Carl Zeiss Sonnar T* +18 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow