|
Re: with low light performance of the 5n, what is the appeal of full-frame?
In reply to ennemkay,
7 months ago
|
ennemkay wrote:
is the dof difference really that significant?
Some thoughts (I speak as a Nikon user, btw)..
DOF, yes. So is the low light performance. Sony's crop sensors used in NEX are very good, but FF is in a different league. Overall performance of the camera, a good FF DSLR does pretty much anything. OVF. Handling. Battery that lasts what seems like forever. Lens lineup offered for full frame systems. And to make it all even sweeter, when you factor in equivalence, FF system is cheaper too. Pay less, get more. Not a bad deal, huh?
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
