|
Re: D5100 vs D5200
In reply to stuntmonkey,
6 months ago
|
stuntmonkey wrote:
D5200, if video matters. Nikon started slow, but the usability of the video function seems to be improving over time. The 39pt system on the D7000 is miles better than the old 11pt system for motion tracking, so if you've been in single point for a while, the D5200 would probably open up a new area for you to explore.
Otherwise, this does seem to be a sweet time to pick up a D5100, if for price alone.
This is the question I want answered. The D5100 is such a great buy right now, but I sold my D3100 in hopes of purchasing something with better video, so if the D5200 proves to have much improved video I am interested.
--
Brian Miller
Nikon D3100 and Canon S100
(Used to own: Nikon D40 and Canon S30)
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 3 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
