16-35 f4 VR or 17-35 f2.8

Started Nov 7, 2012 | Discussions thread
katanaphoto
Contributing MemberPosts: 760
Like?
Re: 16-35 f4 VR or 17-35 f2.8
In reply to Callie de Wet, Nov 8, 2012

I had the 16-25mm f/4 vr for 3 mounts but I lend up selling it because I didn't like the barrow distortion that the lens produce at 16-18mm which looked almost  like fish eye effect. So since I already have 16mm fisheye so I sold it and I just purchased the 17-35mm f/2.8 afs lens and I like it size F/2.8 just the right lens for my wedding stuff. I think I might sell my 14-24mm f/2.8 lens

which is great lens but just too big and to short mm which spends too much time in my case which 17-35mm is more applying and I can use filters on it it as well.

Out of those 3 lenses I found that 17-35mm has the best range compact size which makes this lens a winner. If you buy used watch out for the squeak noise some of those produces.

-- hide signature --

Derek Katana

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow