|
Re: Another happy 35-100 owner
In reply to mpresley,
6 months ago
|
I'm sure this is a good lens but is it worth the price. Other than it being f2.8 I don't think it is any better than my 45-200.
Here are a couple taken with my 45-200 at 200mm, 1600ISO, wide open (f5.6) OOC jpeg just resized down.
I am not trying to start a fight, just saying that unless you really need f2.8, there are other options.
Allan



| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | 4 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago |