Bit confused about the 16-35/F4 vs 17-35/F2.8

Started Nov 6, 2012 | Discussions thread
A Owens
Senior MemberPosts: 2,029
Like?
Re: Bit confused about the 16-35/F4 vs 17-35/F2.8
In reply to Reilly Diefenbach, Nov 7, 2012

Reilly Diefenbach wrote:

The Tokina 16-28 is better and much cheaper than either of them if you don't want the best (the 14-24.)

Neither of these formerly good enough lenses are up to the "e" in my opinion.

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=773&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=4&LensComp=689&CameraComp=614&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=3

There is an F4 17-35 Tokina as well, I need to have a look at that too. But are you saying that only the 14-24 is up to the "e"?

-- hide signature --

Alistair Owens
www.alistairowensphotography.com

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow