Forum indexSony NEX TalkChange forum

Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)

Started 6 months ago | Discussion thread

Forum

Enir4

Senior Member • Posts: 1,354

Like?

Re: re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)

In reply to quezra, 6 months ago

quezra wrote:

I am surprised for all your complaining you haven't noticed the G lens at the top of the only Sony lens chart we have to date that has been posted a thousand times on this forum. To be announced sometime in 2013.

That G walkaround zoom was supposed to be delivered in 2011-2012, according to the roadmap of 2010. Fact is, after 2 years with NEX cameras (I had the 5, C3 and now 5N) there is no high quality walkaround zoom. This was not what Sony promised and it is most frustrating.

Enrique

Reply Reply with quote Complain

Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Laurie Wilson	6 months ago	14
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Hans von der Crone	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Laurie Wilson	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning	technic	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	novak977	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Hans von der Crone	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	technic	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Rehabdoc	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	technic	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Jorginho	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Philip Corlis	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	creeker	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	TiagoReil	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Laurie Wilson	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	TiagoReil	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Enir4	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	santiclaws	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	TiagoReil	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	santiclaws	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	malch	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Laurie Wilson	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	blue_skies	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	twald	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	TiagoReil	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	technic	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Enir4	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	romicva	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Enir4	6 months ago
re: SEL 16-50 & N6...	jpr2	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Adamant	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	romicva	6 months ago
Enrique & Laurie: after the 16-50 fiasco...	jpr2	6 months ago
Re: Enrique & Laurie: after the 16-50 fiasco...	Enir4	6 months ago
Re: Enrique & Laurie: after the 16-50 fiasco...	Cheepnis	6 months ago
Re: Enrique & Laurie: after the 16-50 fiasco...	ericdfw	6 months ago
Re: Enrique & Laurie: after the 16-50 fiasco...	Rehabdoc	6 months ago
re: TWO disqualifying problems with the rx100	jpr2	6 months ago
Re: Enrique & Laurie: after the 16-50 fiasco...	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Rehabdoc	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	willym	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Erik Magnuson	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Rehabdoc	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Erik Magnuson	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	blue_skies	6 months ago	2
Laurie, thanks for your post. The images look good for a kit lens, but nothing you could not	Jerry R	6 months ago
nothing you could not get with the Zeiss 24mm??	technic	6 months ago	1
Technic, a few step forward, a few steps back, & a little cropping.	Jerry R	6 months ago
Re: nothing you could not get with the Zeiss 24mm??	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Laurie, thanks for your post. The images look good for a kit lens, but nothing you could not	linkon	6 months ago
Re: Laurie, thanks for your post. The images look good for a kit lens, but nothing you could not	DA photo	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	FuzzyQball	6 months ago	3
Precicely the point I have been making (nt)	gkstar	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Sergey Borachev	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	gkstar	6 months ago
Survey, the laws of physics also apply to M43. Since th M43 sensor is smaller the lenses	Jerry R	6 months ago
Re: Survey, the laws of physics also apply to M43. Since th M43 sensor is smaller the lenses	captura	6 months ago
Sergey, I am exactly with you.	PeterNMIF	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	Sergey Borachev	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	blue_skies	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	Sergey Borachev	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	malch	6 months ago
re: market as a discerning jury of optical IQ ??	jpr2	6 months ago	1
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	technic	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	Rehabdoc	6 months ago
Re: Sergey, I am exactly with you.	franzel	6 months ago
all about the lenses	technic	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	GodSpeaks	6 months ago
worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	RussellInCincinnati	6 months ago	5
Re: worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	viking79	6 months ago	2
Re: worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	TiagoReil	6 months ago	3
Re: worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	viking79	6 months ago	2
Re: worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	Laurie Wilson	6 months ago
Re: worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	Kashmir442	6 months ago	3
name-calling will get you everywhere	RussellInCincinnati	6 months ago	3
selective quoting and misrepresenting even goes a longer way	robert1955	6 months ago
Well...	cxsparc	6 months ago
Re: Well...	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: worlds' smallest APS-C 16-50 brick wall image lacks tech info	robert1955	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Jonathan_Whiteman	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	technic	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	DimitriDV	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Hans von der Crone	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Rehabdoc	6 months ago
How about some real-world context!	Carlgo	6 months ago	1
Re: How about some real-world context!	Hans von der Crone	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	DimitriDV	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	forpetessake	6 months ago	1
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	burkm	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Beaverhelmet	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Enir4	6 months ago
Duh!	forpetessake	6 months ago	3
Re: Duh!	blue_skies	6 months ago	1
Re: Duh!	Enir4	6 months ago
Re: Duh!	forpetessake	6 months ago
Re: Duh!	Enir4	6 months ago	2
Duh! Again!	forpetessake	6 months ago	3
Re: Duh!	winono	6 months ago	2
Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	jpr2	6 months ago	1
Re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	quezra	6 months ago
Re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	GaryW	6 months ago
re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	jpr2	6 months ago	1
Re: re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	quezra	6 months ago	1
Re: re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	Enir4	6 months ago	3
Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	jpr2	6 months ago	3
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	linkon	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	Enir4	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	upsidedown	6 months ago
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	Enir4	6 months ago	2
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	franzel	6 months ago	1
New oranges ...	forpetessake	6 months ago	1
Re: New oranges ...	Enir4	6 months ago
Re: New oranges ...	blue_skies	6 months ago	2
Re: New oranges ...	franzel	6 months ago	2
Re: New oranges ...	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	franzel	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	verybiglebowski	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	Enir4	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	malch	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	willym	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	Rehabdoc	6 months ago
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	verybiglebowski	6 months ago	1
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	Erik Magnuson	6 months ago
Re: Enrique: a very interesting psychological phenomenon - the 16-50 PZ...	malch	6 months ago
re: excellent photography is possible even with a bottom of a Coke bottle...	jpr2	6 months ago
Re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	quezra	6 months ago
Re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	GaryW	6 months ago
Re: Agostino: IQ of m4/3 is inherently compromised on two counts (at least)	winono	6 months ago	1
Laurie is a guy!	clail	6 months ago	1
Re: Duh!	quezra	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Laurie Wilson	6 months ago
Laurie: figers [tight] crossed that it won't be the same story again with...	jpr2	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	captura	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Enir4	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	technic	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	Russell Evans	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	firefox23508	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	blue_skies	6 months ago
Re: Reluctantly returning 16-50 (not a short post)	firefox23508	6 months ago	1

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

This is why to shoot in RAW	120
Why are DSLRs left home 90.2% of the time	109
Nikon AF-S 85mm f/1.4 lens not so hot.	84
Does anybody shoot 16:9?	80
Did Nikon screw up?	49
OH MY GOD THE GX2 OH MY GOD	48
Show us ONE of your recent favorite picture and...	43
Micro Four Thirds body deflation	39
If the GX2 really had . . .	34
LX7 Over LF1	33
Does DPreview waste your time, too?	33
Firmware upgrade causes AF slow down on 18-55!	33
*** MINI CHALLENGE 303 *** UNDER 6 MP ...	29
about new XF55/200: I've seen only now	28
<<<< Challenge 209: Results!!! >>>>	28
Really Dumb camera can't take photos	28
Old-timers were in town III.	28
When size matters (D800 pixel count)	25
GR and X100s side by side shots	24
Advice needed. Photography student 'upgrading' ...	24