|
Re: Should I sell my 100 f/2.8 macro and/or 70-200 f/4 for 135L?
In reply to crasher7,
6 months ago
|
crasher7 wrote:
What I would do thing:
I'd keep the macro. It does so many things and does them all pretty well. Then there's the gem the f/4 tele. I have one and it is hard to beat the IQ and good existing light images are magic with this lens.
I think you have 90% of what a 135L can do for you already. I'd look into a focusing rail for that Macro lens and play on the mfd side for a while.
This is actually what I want to find out
I am thinking the 100mm macro and the 70-200 f/4 are already good enough for me
So, I just wonder whether the 135L is something I need; I do not think I need all 3 lenses....so I would rather keep 2 of them, so either 100 + 70-200 or 135 + 70-200
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago |