Should I sell my 100 f/2.8 macro and/or 70-200 f/4 for 135L?

Started 6 months ago | Discussion thread
goshigoo
Contributing MemberPosts: 517
Like?
Re: Should I sell my 100 f/2.8 macro and/or 70-200 f/4 for 135L?
In reply to crasher7, 6 months ago

crasher7 wrote:

What I would do thing:

I'd keep the macro. It does so many things and does them all pretty well. Then there's the gem the f/4 tele. I have one and it is hard to beat the IQ and good existing light images are magic with this lens.

I think you have 90% of what a 135L can do for you already. I'd look into a focusing rail for that Macro lens and play on the mfd side for a while.

This is actually what I want to find out

I am thinking the 100mm macro and the 70-200 f/4 are already good enough for me

So, I just wonder whether the 135L is something I need; I do not think I need all 3 lenses....so I would rather keep 2 of them, so either 100 + 70-200 or 135 + 70-200

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow