|
Re: I agree
In reply to Jorginho,
6 months ago
|
Jorginho wrote:
And many of us said f2.0 should have been the speed. I know I know: that lens would have been much more expensive and bigger which makes less sense for the format. True. May be they should have made a 14-50 f2.0 and a 50-100 f2.0-f2.5. The first one becoming a bit bigger and the last one a bit smaller. May be Oly can come to the rescue, because they do not need OIS making the lens smaller.
But I'll await mre samples to draw my personal conclusions.
Of course you can't expect it to equal the quality of the 14-35mm nor the 35-100mm f2, but I doubt Oly would make the m43 versions of those lenses (though I'm happy to be proven wrong). At the end it's all about how much quality you are willing to sacrifice for versatility.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | 5 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago | |||
| 5 months ago |