
|
Re: Tell that to Canon
In reply to Devendra,
6 months ago
|
Devendra wrote:
michaeladawson wrote:
Devendra wrote:
michaeladawson wrote:
Devendra wrote:
Nikon should look into that option and bring out a wider spread out AF point(s) in FX.
Approach of introducing:
Phase 1. Hybrid - Have current spread out + Have a 5-7 more few spread AF points
Phase 2. Have a wider spread out - just like DX models
There are many times when I am trying to compose a shot and the AF spread in FX isn't enough. While some may argue endlessly about overcoming the short comings, I will happily ignore the responses.
I will let others trail this topic all over the place, but I think Nikon does seriously need a wider AF module in their FX line - regardless of how they will achieve it.
Doesn't the fact that neither major company has wider coverage tell you something about the feasibility?
--
Mike Dawson
yes it tells me that either companies are being lazy or holding it back.
to me, it is not if they cannot provide that, its when they will. AF technology is not 4yrs old, but more like 30-40yrs old. Give me atleast single/static wider AF points. I don't even need them for continuous focus. all i need them is for static subjects... for starters.. and then they can add more whatever else they want.
People have been complaining about this ever since full frame digital camera came out. You don't think that either company could score major points over the other if it came out with wider AF coverage first? Sure. The only possible explanation for this is that both companies are holding back. If you want to believe that go right ahead.
--
Mike Dawson
i will believe in whatever i want. but, it looks like you are taking it personally and seem to have a problem with that.
Yeah, and that's the only explanation for my responses. I'm taking it personally. I started out nice. Your first post in this thread basically said I'm going to believe what I want to believe no matter what anyone else said. I can see it was a waste to respond to ou in the first place.
--
Mike Dawson
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 4 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 3 | ||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 3 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | 2 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 3 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 1 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | 2 | ||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 6 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |