E-M6 + 17mm f1.8

Started Oct 29, 2012 | Discussions thread
sigala1
Senior MemberPosts: 3,263
Like?
Would need to be 17.5mm f/1.0
In reply to Brian Mosley, Nov 4, 2012

Brian Mosley wrote:

Now would be a terrific time for Olympus to announce the (even) higher grade O-MD model together with the high grade 17mm f1.8 to outshine the Sony RX1... as an E-P3 + X100 owner, that would be a perfect upgrade for me.

Anyone else holding out for the big step up from E-P3?

Cheers

Brian

-- hide signature --

Join our free worldwide support network here : http://www.ukphotosafari.org/join-the-ukpsg/ UK, Peak District Local Olympus Safari Group : http://snipurl.com/bqtd7-ukpsg Keep up with me here : http://twitter.com/alert_bri

To equal the shallow DOF and low-light ability of the Sony RX1, you would need a 17.5mm f/1.0 lens.

There exists an f/0.95 lens made by a third party, but it doesn't seem very practical given it's sky-high price, large size and weight, and lack of auto-anything.

Furthemore, the RX1 is best compared to the E-PM2 and not the E-M series. The E-M series has features like built-in EVF, tilting LCD, weather sealing and 5-axis IBIS that the RX1 lacks.

So E-PM2 + 17.5mm 1/1.8 is the poor man's RX1. It's not going to have the extreme shallow DOF and low-light performance, but it is less than 40% the price, and you can use it with other lenses (even the useful and underrated kit lens which comes included), and put the 35mm f/1.8 lens on a future body, so it's definitely more cost effective and versatile.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow