a surprising nikon 17-35/2.8 review by photozone

Started Oct 14, 2011 | Discussions thread
StillLearning
Senior MemberPosts: 2,264
Like?
Re: a surprising nikon 17-35/2.8 review by photozone
In reply to phototrope, Nov 1, 2012

phototrope wrote:

And would add that the a 17-35 lens obviously beats the 14-24 for convenience. And that is the reason why I would join the line for an updated Nikon 17-35/2.8 *without* VR.

(Nikon released a patent for a 16-35/2.8 round about the same time as the patent for the 28/1.8. The latter, for me, totally redundant).

I will definitely be looking at the 16-35 2.8  when it appears.  For now I will stick with the 17-35 with my D800.

-

http://www.pbase.com/stilllearning/inbox

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
(unknown member)
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow