Canon 100-400 or 300 f/4 IS???

Started Oct 29, 2012 | Discussions thread
Alton (TN)
Contributing MemberPosts: 985
Like?
Agree about faster shutter speed and monopod!
In reply to dock, Oct 31, 2012

I also was reluctant about the 400 not having IS, but so far I haven't had one picture from it that was lost because of blur movement.

In any event, I usually have the camera on a mono pod or tripod. Although, one of my better shots was with the Bigma handheld (with the tripod dangling beneath it) using IS.



There was no place to plant the tripod and the opportunity was over in less than 20 seconds, but generally my pictures benefit from using a support or a fast shutter speed.

-- hide signature --

Alton

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow