
|
Re: Buddy at work wants to get camera for wife. Sony a37,t3i,d5100
In reply to Limburger,
7 months ago
|
Limburger wrote:
tallymom wrote:
If his wife is not going to be a professional photographer, I don't see why lens selection really matters that much. Sony has great DSLR's based on my research. I was looking at the Sony a57 and the only reason I decided against it is because my husband prefers OVF. I didn't mind the EVF but then again I only tested it in a Best Buy store.
If lenses don't matter I wonder why go for a dslr in the first place?
--
Cheers Mike
Those are my thoughts. However, it can be said DSLRS provide the best image quality. So maybe that's their reasoning. A counter point to that is the nex 5n which uses the same sensor as the D7000. However I was told his wife wanted a DSLR not a nex. So I had to assume it was because of the viewfinder, which led me to explaining that Optical was much better. Comparing looking at a scene through your eyes and through what a computer monitor thought the scene should look like.
I wanted to ask others to gain perspective, since I have a strong bias and might be overlooking something.
I think the sony has some nice points. 7fps is cool. But to me, excessive. I can just imagine hundreds of shots of the same thing. His main point is buying a used t3i/D5100 vs a new a37. To which I replied you get what you pay for.
I was hoping the a37 had the same sensor as the d7000, but it looks to be different.
I will talk to him again and ask him to ask her to go try them out. I have a feeling that a37's build is no where near the t3i or d5100, but I could be wrong.
--
never stop learning
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago |