
6 hours ago
|
Re: Canon EF 70-200 mm f / 2.8 L IS II USM versus Panasonic 35-100 mm f / 2.8
In reply to Starred,
7 months ago
|
Had to read the translation close - but the bottom line appears to be "there is no absolute winner in this challenge". If the tests were comprehensive and competent, this is good news for m43s.
My wife and I made the switch to m43s from Canon 7Ds, in large measure because the bodies and lenses were bulky and heavy; we hike, backpack, and travel when possible. So, m43s has been liberating for us.
We already have one 12-35, plan on another, and will pick up a 35-100 when budget allows. It seems like a no-brainer to us. The range of the 35-100 is familiar and we expect the 35-100 to be another great Panasonic lens.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago |