Tamron 17-50 2.8 (non-VC) vs. Tamron 17-50 2.8 (VC)

Started Jul 10, 2012 | Discussions thread
pekr
Regular MemberPosts: 459
Like?
Re: Tamron 17-50 2.8 (non-VC) vs. Tamron 17-50 2.8 (VC)
In reply to jdurant, Oct 20, 2012

Well, my friend is just testing my several years old Tamron, and she is very excited. She urges me to sell the lens to her, and buy new version

So - I am right now reading some reviews, trying to decide, if I should buy VC or non-VC version. My recent Tamron does not have VC, but it is true, that I shoot concerts too. But - I am also used to the sharpness of my recent Tamron. Reading following review I am not sure, if I would trade eventual softness with VC?

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/Tamron-17-50mm-f-2.8-XR-Di-II-VC-Lens-Review.aspx

Petr

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow