
|
Re: Luego's Panasonic GF3X: How sharp is the Vario PZ 14-42mm lens?
In reply to Luego,
7 months ago
|
Hi Luego,
There has been much hand wringing about this lens. To be frank, I think a lot has to do with the body used, the focal length and the distance to subject.
I come from a Nikon background. I have been selling off my Nikon gear and getting more involved with my OM-D E-M5. I started with a 12mm, 17mm and 45mm Oly set. Purchased a 12-35mm (At $1,299) then got a 100-300 Panny. I returned the 12-35 Panny due to the price drop and the fact I was not comfortable with such an expensive MFT lens until I knew the MFT system warranted such expensive glass.
I really wanted a compact zoom lens and as far as I know the only game in town is the 14-42 PZ Panny. Well after a number of shots and serious review I have come up with the conclusion that this is a very underrated lenses. (Please understand, I have not experienced the double image problem others seem to have with this lens.) IMHO, the images look great. Great color, Great contrast and sharp) I am not sure if focus distance is an issue, but near field sharpness at 42mm seems fine. (My 100-300 seems to be tack sharp near field, but at infinity it softens up at the long end.) I will put together a folder on Smugmug of my OOC results with this lens for all to play with. But I must say this lens is nice. I really appreciate the compact form factor. In fact I enjoy using my 14-42 PZ more than the 12-35 due to its compact nature, both in and out of my camera bag.
Please understand, I sold off may excellent Nikkor's including my 24-70mm f2.8. So when I say I enjoy the 14-42 PZ more than the 12-35mm, I know what that lens is and I appreciate it very much. I just enjoy the size and weight of the little Panny PZ a great deal.
If someone could explain to my why some lenses will give a double image at some focal lengths on some bodies, I would appreciate it.
Another reason I returned the 12-35 was that at $1,299USD I said to myself "Heck, for another $100, I could get the Fuji X-E1 kit with their 18-55mm lens. However the seriously good results I am starting to get with my E-M5 makes me yearn less for the Fuji.
--
Regards,
Jeff Morris / Homecinemaman
Adams, Gutmann, Steichen, Snoopy, Stigletz, Weston. they lead by example.
I hunt, I peck, I squint, all on a MacBook Pro 13" laptop. So don't laugh, I'm happy there aren't more typo's! (Love the screen and touch pad, hate the keyboard.)
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 3 months ago |