|
Re: re: yes, oficial reviewers might be [and usually are] in a binding agreement...
In reply to jpr2,
7 months ago
|
What I heard is
The first wave of testers don't have 16-50mm lens in hands.
The old 18-55 lens need firmware update to comply PDAF, which is not available right now.
Although a few testers who do have 16-50mm to test reported mixed bag.
Some said they are not faster than older NEX.
Some said they are much faster than fastest NEX, on par with m43.
jpr2 wrote:
nevercat wrote:
I don't find it that strange, as most don't have a a camera with a production version of the firmware. So they can't really tell a lot about how good (or bad) it is.
jpr2
--
street candids (non-interactive):
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157609618638319/
music and dance:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157600341265280/
B&W:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157623306407882/
wildlife & macro:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157600341377106/
interactive street:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/qmusaget/sets/72157623181919323/
Comments and critique are always welcome!
~
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 3 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 3 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 2 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | |||
| 7 months ago | 1 | ||
| 7 months ago |
   |
|
Connect with dpreview
|
