Worrying OM-D review at Biofos.com?

ju_ju wrote:

Hi david. a suggestion. I think you are coming from the wrong direction. OM film cameras used film which is a completely different type of technology. Raw files are much closer to film than jpeg's as they have more headroom for alteration. This is what we did with film in the dark room. Jepegs are a bit akin to how people took their rolls of film to a shop like woolmart and allowed the manufacturers and processing machines to dictate the output. Raw files need to be shot correctly as much as jpegs for many desired outcomes even more so. You aught to give it a try, I don't know anyone of the film era who considers shooting  valued shots in jpeg as they want to get all parameters right and not to leave it to the guess work of jpeg engines.   If you are worried about what other people say about the things you purchase it may be best not to read reviews.  I did not read a lot of the said review, but enough, what I  read indicated  a lack of understanding about photography in general, let alone any particular camera. Just enjoy the camera, its an ok one.