
4 hours ago
|
Re: Nikon needs to make a constant f/4 tele
In reply to hikerdoc,
8 months ago
|
hikerdoc wrote:
if it does not need to be Nikon both Sigma (1250 USD) and Tamron (new model) have 70-200 f/2.8 with stabilization
I've tested the Sigma and owned the older Tamron (better IQ than the Sigma but no "VR"). The Canon 70-200 f4 is a better performing lens than either at 1/2 the price (and sells very well as a result). So I think the market would be similarly strong with a Nikon version.
Joe
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | 1 | ||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | 1 | ||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | 1 | ||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago |