Does the Oled viewfinder in the a65 make the $200 difference over the a57 worth it?

Started Oct 6, 2012 | Questions thread
dodgebaena
Regular MemberPosts: 242
Like?
Re: Does the Oled viewfinder in the a65 make the $200 difference over the a57 worth it?
In reply to EvilOne, Oct 11, 2012

I have both a65 and a57 and the only downside to the a57 is the viewfinder. But you know what, the mind has the ability to adjust and extrapolate what the eyes capture and what the brain sees, and I've gotten used to the a57.  I prefer the a57 for its higher video ISO (SO3200) and what seems to me to be better audio capture. High ISO performance seems better and the jpgs look less  blotchy on the a57. The good thing for both cmeras is the LCD screen, which I now use more than 50% of the time.

So for me, the OLED viewfinder is not worth $200, esp since the higher video ISO on the a57 is worth $200 extra to me, if I had to pay for it.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow