4/3rds Telephoto Disadvantage

Started Oct 6, 2012 | Discussions thread
davidrm
Senior MemberPosts: 1,333
Like?
Re: 4/3rds Telephoto Disadvantage
In reply to SirSeth, Oct 9, 2012

SirSeth wrote:

Thanks everyone.

Skeeterbytes, I know what you mean about stabilization. My Slik 500DX has always been a good set of sticks until the 300mm came along; then it was like jello. I made a wooden Berleback clone since I do a little wood working, but it's huge. Diddo on the million dollar gimbal. Opteka makes one for about half a million, that I might spring for though because for really big glass, tracking is really difficult. I'd love an Acratech ball head and some Feisol legs some day too. This is an expensive hobby, but at least my hobby isn't flying jets.

Cheers,

Seth

-- hide signature --

What if the hokey pokey really is what it's all about?
--
wallygoots.smugmug.com
wallygoots.blogspot.com

I've been using Acratech ball heads for years. They're good, but I'm not sure they're exactly what you need. With the 50-200 they suffer from some creep. Photographing the moon is an exercise in frustration. However for general landape use they're pretty good - very solid, not too heavy, very reliable.

-- hide signature --

Blogs and galleries at http://www.snowhenge.net E-System photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/snowhenge/

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow