Exploding two myths about DX...

Started 7 months ago | Discussion thread
justin_time
Regular MemberPosts: 226
Like?
Re: Exploding two myths about DX...
In reply to JimPearce, 7 months ago

JimPearce wrote:

These two myths are so prevalent here and elsewhere that everyone will recognize them immediately. Both are patently false:

1. Mirrorless is eating into APS-C DSLR sales.

CIPA reported sales of approx. 14 million DSLRs and 4 million mirrorless in 2011; projects sales of 16 million DSLRs and 6 million mirrorless in 2012. Sales are on track. Conclusion: mirrorless is not eating into DSLR sales.

Not yet at least. But with Olympus OM-D EM-5 & Fuji X-E1 and no D400/improved DX lenses, then There might be a flood of disgruntled Nikon DX users moving elsewhere in 2013.

2. FX is being developed further; DX has hit a wall. This is particularly true due to increased pixel density.

I'll just use a sample comparison from dxomarks. The D300 starts to get quite noisy after ISO 800. Comparing the D300 and D700 at ISO 800, DRs are 9.89 and 11.49 respectively. The difference: 1.6 stops. Looking at the two current 24 MP cameras, the D3200 and the D600 the DRs are 10.51 and 11.95 at ISO 800 - a difference of 1.44 stops.

In one way you are correct that DX sensors are still advancing at same rate as FX. But the problem is that Nikon have not put a state of the art DX sensor in a pro/prosumer body since 2007, so Nikon has chosen to slam the brakes on in this sector and force users to look elsewhere (FX, canon, mirrorless).

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow