Cured from glorifying the past!

Started Sep 28, 2012 | Discussions thread
cxsparc
Senior MemberPosts: 1,412
Like?
Re: ** years later ...
In reply to D Cox, Sep 30, 2012

D Cox wrote:

Yes, it is very expensive to preserve digital data. A book can be put on a shelf and left for decades. Black-and-white film seems to last very well.

Expensive? I can copy my digitized videos and photos with a minimum of money for technical equipment and time. Just select, and then click copying to new target.
Then go for a cup of coffe/tea.

In contrast, the professional scanning of 3000 slides and 120 film shots cost me hundreds of Euros.

On top of that, I have already spent days (!) in the process of cleaning the scans, removing the black border, correcting white balance. And I am not even finished yet!

Therefore, I would claim that preserving analog data is much more expensive and time consuming. As soon as you have it in digital form, backing up is a breeze.

Furthermore, film, even if stored correctly, deteroriates due to chemical processes.
Pocket film is worst in that regard.
--
Nex-Blog: http://luxorphotoart.blogspot.de/

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow