D600 RAW is not much better than A900

Started Sep 27, 2012 | Discussions thread
Michel J
Veteran MemberPosts: 4,009Gear list
Like?
Re: D600 RAW is not much better than A900
In reply to TrojMacReady, Sep 28, 2012

TrojMacReady wrote:

Michel J wrote:

Amateur Sony Shooter wrote:

DPR has added D600 studio image to their database for us to compare different cameras. When I looked the RAW up to ISO3200, I don't really see meaningful difference between D600, 5D3, D800 and A900. These new generation sensors might be one stop better than A900 in therms of high ISO. Did I miss anything?

Not better, because of the limits of the laws of physics?

Reason why I suggested a dedicated sensor for low ISO here:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1014&message=41972223

Purpose built astrophotography sensors are within reach of the current Exmors, so there's not much to win (in terms of photons for a single exposure time), regardless of design.

Thanks. Yes you right (and I did not know).

But why not a FF sensor with the backlit design?

Sony told «it was not necessary according to the large surface of photodiodes in the DSLR world » , so... I'm not sure at all about this argument

Kind Regards,

-- hide signature --

Michel J

 Michel J's gear list:Michel J's gear list
Sony SLT-A77 Sony SLT-A37 Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D Sony DT 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 SAM +5 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow