Post (hide subjects)	Posted by	When
The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	eaa	9 months ago
Common	BDTROUT	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	Danielvr	9 months ago	1
No way	eaa	9 months ago
I agree with the painting you submited	dpalugyay	9 months ago
Re: Maybee you never have been out of the city?	TorsteinH	9 months ago
Re: E5 crappy? No way, but...	Chris Mak	9 months ago
Re: No way	kievis	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	John King	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	Danielvr	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	John King	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	philosomatographer	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	veroman	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	Danielvr	9 months ago
Eaa, please consider this	philosomatographer	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	Hans H. Siegrist	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	archrich	9 months ago
Here's another...	jkrumm	9 months ago
Re: Here's another...	eaa	9 months ago
Photo of log cabin in need of repair	dave gaines	9 months ago
Dunno about the E-5, but the thread title is.	goblin	9 months ago
Not at all!	Calinature	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	rude	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	John Iversen	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	SirSeth	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	rude	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	SirSeth	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	rude	9 months ago
Erik...	rssarma	9 months ago
A different take	TrapperJohn	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	CollBaxter	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	Martin Muehlemann	9 months ago
Watercolors explained	eaa	9 months ago
Re: Watercolors explained	Bruce Clarke	9 months ago
Re: Watercolors explained	Danielvr	9 months ago
Re: Watercolors explained	eaa	9 months ago
Re: Watercolors explained	Bruce Clarke	9 months ago
Re: Watercolors explained	veroman	9 months ago
The real thing	eaa	9 months ago
Re: The real thing	veroman	9 months ago
Re: The real thing	eaa	9 months ago
Re: The real thing	veroman	9 months ago
Re: The real thing	eaa	8 months ago
Re: The real thing	veroman	8 months ago
For heaven's sake, send me the RAW!!	philosomatographer	8 months ago
Reality check	Everdog	9 months ago
Re: Reality check	John King	9 months ago
Re: Reality check	Everdog	9 months ago
Re: Reality check	R2elk	9 months ago
camera for standard 4/3 lenses	Rmark	9 months ago
Re: camera for standard 4/3 lenses	Butchy	9 months ago
Re: camera for standard 4/3 lenses	CollBaxter	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	Geodasher	9 months ago
Gee, my e-5 makes crappy pictures like that too. What	Bobby J	9 months ago
The sensor for it's target market, yes	Raist3d	9 months ago
Ricardo,	Bernard au Clairvaux	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	Roger Engelken	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	OM User	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	Durm	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	Danielvr	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	Durm	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	nyfalls	9 months ago
is it really that crappy? Yes for some, no for others	rovingtim	9 months ago
Re: is it really that crappy? Yes for some, no for others	Chris Mak	9 months ago
Re: is it really that crappy? Yes for some, no for others	OM 6Ti Plus	9 months ago
Re: is it really that crappy? Yes for some, no for others	Braxton7	9 months ago
E-5 E-30 E-620 all use the same sensor	Everdog	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	bobdant	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	Roger Engelken	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	Martin Muehlemann	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	bobdant	9 months ago
Re: The E-5 - is it really that crappy?	Martin Muehlemann	9 months ago
The unprocessed original here	eaa	9 months ago
Re: The unprocessed original here	jkrumm	9 months ago
Re: The unprocessed original here	eaa	9 months ago
Re: The unprocessed original here	CollBaxter	9 months ago
Standardization needed	eaa	9 months ago
Re: Standardization needed	kievis	9 months ago
Re: Standardization needed	eaa	8 months ago
Re: Standardization needed	kievis	8 months ago
Re: Standardization needed	eaa	8 months ago
Re: Standardization needed	kievis	8 months ago
Re: The unprocessed original here	Bruce Clarke	9 months ago
Re: The unprocessed original here	eaa	8 months ago
Re: The unprocessed original here	Bruce Clarke	8 months ago
Re: The unprocessed original here	John King	8 months ago
Re: The unprocessed original here	Bruce Clarke	8 months ago

Forum

Parent

First

Next unread

Keyboard shortcuts:

FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads

Color scheme? Blue / Yellow

Editorial content

Product database

Community

Samsung gets it right - look here, Oly!	88
Insensitive composition..	86
Leica M Monochrom vs DP2 Merril in a BW ...	66
32mm f/1.2 - more (bad) pictures	60
Why not a Pentax FullFrame - that's simple, ...	51
New rumour on SAR	51
*Weekly Wildlife Thread: June 16 - 22*	48
Uninspiring performance of Nikon 105mm VR micro	43
"Bokeh" overrated? I think so!	41
If you had to choose between the 12mm or the ...	39
e-p5 What's not to love	38
Which camera, driving me crazy!!!	36
E5 shutter dies ... in the middle of shooting ...	33
$2000 mft Budget	32
VF-4 is a Revelation	31
Considering switching systems	30
Which lens/ lenses to carry?	29
Does anyone use X-pro 1 profesionally?	28
Lightzone is back and Open source!	27
The D600 and Sigma 35mm f1.4 (high rez picture ...	27