Dxomarks professionalism

Started Sep 19, 2012 | Discussions thread
miketala
Regular MemberPosts: 253
Like?
Re: Pedestrian Amateurism and Vehement Hand Wringing
In reply to Detail Man, Sep 23, 2012

Despite the insanity of this website, it presents some compelling evidence that DxO is garbage. For example, DxO measures the Canon 5dmark iii sensor as having less noise than the Nikon D800 at every iso and greater dynamic range at moderate to high ISO's, but the Nikon gets a significantly better Sports/Low Light iso "score."

Detail Man wrote:

Here's a Canon fanboy who vehemently loathes DxO Labs, and whose blog-site might be a welcome oasis for self-styled industry-mavens and sundry luminaries. Lots to keep you amused:

http://fakechuckwestfall.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/dxomark.jpg?w=584

http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2012/05/21/canon-5d-mark-iii-vs-nikon-d800-image-quality-dxomark-sucks-balls/

http://fakechuckwestfall.wordpress.com/2012/07/06/mirrorless-5d-mark-iii-d800-dxo-mark-sucks-balls/

Warning: Most of the people leaving comments on his blog-site seem to think he is a total nimrod.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow