Why insist on FF format?

Started Sep 22, 2012 | Discussions thread
RJPeter
Regular MemberPosts: 329Gear list
Like?
Re: Why insist on FF format?
In reply to kelly15, Sep 23, 2012

kelly15 wrote:

There is no reason at all, unless you are a pro, and a very spacialized pro.
The quality of m43 is more than what is really needed for any kind of use.
Which is the reason to click at 12800 ISO?
Which is the reason to enlarge the screen to 1:1?

Look at the pictures you may take with the 45 and 75 oly, with the 25, 7/14 pana and so and compare them with the pictures you took at the film era.
No comparison.

Of ourse if you decide to walk heavy and bulky, to spend more money for nothing ( or so), you can do that, but you loose the possibility to have you camera set always with you with a quality level which is a dream.

Listen to me, in 3/4 years FF will disappear or limited to studio professional work only.

Ciao

Most photographers, non pros and maybe some pros can get good enough results with less than 'full frame'.
But that is a lot different than FF disappearing.

Rather than spending your time making silly predictions, why don't you just get on with what you enjoy and not bother about other gear that you find unsuitable.

Until m4/3 is capable of follow focus at a high level, there are many situations where it will not replace many larger format cameras.

-- hide signature --
 RJPeter's gear list:RJPeter's gear list
Canon EOS 7D Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH2 Nikon D800 Samsung NX20 Nikon D7100 +41 more
Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
DOFNew
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow