|
Re: IS or non IS
In reply to Andrew Hagan,
8 months ago
|
If you're shooting from a tripod, I don't see the point of the IS version. I
still
have both versions, alas. The IS version is slightly sharper from 170-200mm, but otherwise there's nothing in it. Arguably, the non-IS version has better colour. Save your money.
Michael
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago |