
1 hour ago
|
6D - all official samples are out, thoughts
9 months ago
|
Looking at the samples, I wonder:
Why are the files so small? Did Canon choose to compress the only files to be seen for a few following months, so that they save few Yen on data transfer costs? Or are these some basic quality files from camera? Is anyone able to find in the EXIFs, at what quality these files were shot?
Were these shots photographed by competent photographers?
I have an unpleasant feeling of softness and lack of fine detail from all these photos.
Photo 4 - very ugly - fine branches bombed out by noise and NR
Photo 5 - soft, did they focus few centimetres in front of the eyes?
Photo 8 - the "skin islands" look like patches of blurred mixed colours on painters palette.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago | |||
| 9 months ago |