|
Re: SX50 brief video and comparison
In reply to jasenj1,
8 months ago
|
Well, we'll see what we'll see. Agree with questions about how good that high ISO compensation for the slow lens can possibly be. I'd also be curious about whether anything done with IS really enables handheld shooting at these focal lengths with closed apertures. One thing that grabbed me about the video was the shot of the lens barrel markings: very short gap between 600mm and 1200mm. Made me wonder what adjustment in that range is like.
I'll say this was not what I expected for the next iteration, and the slow lens is a disappointment. This seems to be a birder special.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 4 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago |