|
Re: Hard to believe digiKam does it all
In reply to CAcreeks,
8 months ago
|
CAcreeks wrote:
Have you compared it to noise reduction methods in GIMP?
As I said, I never bother with noise reduction. However, digiKam has a big advantage over the Gimp for heavy processing operations, it supports 16 bit per channel editing. The Gimp is still only 8 bit per channel. It can make a huge difference for things like sharpening. I imagine that the same would be true for denoising.
Fuji EXR models, which are not supported well even by Adobe.
Looks like the latest digiKam has support for it:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1006&message=41994442
In OpenSuse the current version of digiKam (using Tumbleweed repos) is 2.6.0. But, 2.7.0 must surely be right around the corner.
| Post (hide subjects) | Posted by | When | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago | |||
| 8 months ago |