D600, for me too little, too late for too much

Started Sep 13, 2012 | Discussions thread
freddyNZ
Senior MemberPosts: 2,509
Like?
Re: D600, for me too little, too late for too much
In reply to sshoihet, Sep 15, 2012

sshoihet wrote:

depending on your application, the D600 may be more of a sidegrade from the D700... for landscapes the D600 extra resolution may be nice. For portraits, the D700 is still a great camera. For low light, high ISO performance, the D600 appears to have a slight edge but depending on how you display your images, this might not be readily apparent anyway.

The D600 shoots faster than a D800, has a 100% VF unlike a D700, and more pixels than a D4. The D700 is obsolete - so get over it.

Is it the perfect camera? Nope. Was the D700? Nope. Is it the D300 replacement? Nope.

Reply   Reply with quote   Complain
Post (hide subjects)Posted by
Keyboard shortcuts:
FForum PPrevious NNext WNext unread UUpvote SSubscribe RReply QQuote BBookmark post MMy threads
Color scheme? Blue / Yellow